Comments on: Intergraph 2008 – Day 1 http://jeffhobbs.net/2008/06/05/intergraph-2008-day-1/ "A picture is only worth a thousand words. A map may be worth a thousand numbers. But a GIS is worth a thousand tables." Mon, 26 Jul 2010 03:43:50 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.com/ By: MUKESH http://jeffhobbs.net/2008/06/05/intergraph-2008-day-1/#comment-2518 MUKESH Mon, 17 Aug 2009 12:15:58 +0000 http://jeffhobbs.wordpress.com/2008/06/05/intergraph-2008-day-1/#comment-2518 mukesh said July 14, 2009 at 10:49 pm I wants to create some slope polygons as my Area of responsibility (approx 600*600 km total area ) with using of software geomedia 6.1 & geomedia terrain 6.1 .input data I am using 30 meters elevation data in .dt2 format when I am doing this I am facing the following problem :- needed to open the slpoe polygons of approx. 86- 50K Scale maps. The slope polygon created was not able to open in the geoworkspace, shows the error Geomedia.exe encountered the problem. Solution tried by me: a. Connected the feature class one by one in the legend entry, Eight 50K maps were connected to the geoworkspace, but after adding the legends of ninth map the Geomedia aborted. There were more than 15 lacks feature in the mdb of 16 maps, the feature class created were of slopes with categories 0 to 20, 20 to 25, 25 to 30, 30 to 35, 35 to 40, 40 to 45, 45 to 50 and 50 to 90 degrees b. Than I converted the mdb of slope polygons to the .ddc format and connected it to the geoworkspace, than also same problem occurred . Note :- After slope polygons my mdb size is 1.9 gb to 2 gb mukesh said
July 14, 2009 at 10:49 pm
I wants to create some slope polygons as my Area of responsibility (approx 600*600 km total area ) with using of software geomedia 6.1 & geomedia terrain 6.1 .input data I am using 30 meters elevation data in .dt2 format when I am doing this I am facing the following problem :-
needed to open the slpoe polygons of approx. 86- 50K Scale maps.
The slope polygon created was not able to open in the geoworkspace, shows the error Geomedia.exe encountered the problem.
Solution tried by me:
a. Connected the feature class one by one in the legend entry, Eight 50K maps were connected to the geoworkspace, but after adding the legends of ninth map the Geomedia aborted.
There were more than 15 lacks feature in the mdb of 16 maps, the feature class created were of slopes with categories 0 to 20, 20 to 25, 25 to 30, 30 to 35, 35 to 40, 40 to 45, 45 to 50 and 50 to 90 degrees
b. Than I converted the mdb of slope polygons to the .ddc format and connected it to the geoworkspace, than also same problem occurred .
Note :- After slope polygons my mdb size is 1.9 gb to 2 gb

]]> By: Bill http://jeffhobbs.net/2008/06/05/intergraph-2008-day-1/#comment-2067 Bill Tue, 15 Jul 2008 06:27:24 +0000 http://jeffhobbs.wordpress.com/2008/06/05/intergraph-2008-day-1/#comment-2067 Jeff, Just wondering if youve heard of a timeline for SQL Server 2008 Spatial support in Geomedia. Of course I have seen the press releases, but no mention of when, but I expect some news given the recent shipment of ArcGIS 9.3 which supports the new spatial types. Jeff,

Just wondering if youve heard of a timeline for SQL Server 2008 Spatial support in Geomedia. Of course I have seen the press releases, but no mention of when, but I expect some news given the recent shipment of ArcGIS 9.3 which supports the new spatial types.

]]> By: Jeff Hobbs http://jeffhobbs.net/2008/06/05/intergraph-2008-day-1/#comment-2034 Jeff Hobbs Wed, 11 Jun 2008 06:20:48 +0000 http://jeffhobbs.wordpress.com/2008/06/05/intergraph-2008-day-1/#comment-2034 Amit, I don't agree. I have no problems having two implementations (one for Oracle and one for others). However Oracle Workspace Manager is used by many different applications and pieces of software. Although Oracle itself it proprietary, in my opinion it's much better to use something where the majority of the GIS community as a whole embraces as opposed to a proprietary implementation that's locked to one vendor. Look at it this way, if I maintain transaction and temporal history in an ArcSDE system, I MUST stay with ESRI to keep my temporal history. As soon as I leave the ESRI environment, I also lose my temporal history. This is a bad thing...especially if I've got history for many years now. With OWM on the other hand, I can leave Intergraph GeoMedia technology tomorrow. As long as I can find another vendor that supports OWN (and there are many), my temporal history goes with me to any other vendor. Not to mention, I can call a fairly simple Oracle procedure to edit my data outside of the GeoMedia environment and STILL maintain that temporal history. Try doing that with ArcSDE...it's bad news. You need something like GTM/OWN and maintain the vendor neutrality. Amit,

I don’t agree. I have no problems having two implementations (one for Oracle and one for others). However Oracle Workspace Manager is used by many different applications and pieces of software. Although Oracle itself it proprietary, in my opinion it’s much better to use something where the majority of the GIS community as a whole embraces as opposed to a proprietary implementation that’s locked to one vendor. Look at it this way, if I maintain transaction and temporal history in an ArcSDE system, I MUST stay with ESRI to keep my temporal history. As soon as I leave the ESRI environment, I also lose my temporal history. This is a bad thing…especially if I’ve got history for many years now. With OWM on the other hand, I can leave Intergraph GeoMedia technology tomorrow. As long as I can find another vendor that supports OWN (and there are many), my temporal history goes with me to any other vendor. Not to mention, I can call a fairly simple Oracle procedure to edit my data outside of the GeoMedia environment and STILL maintain that temporal history. Try doing that with ArcSDE…it’s bad news. You need something like GTM/OWN and maintain the vendor neutrality.

]]> By: Amit Kulkarni http://jeffhobbs.net/2008/06/05/intergraph-2008-day-1/#comment-2029 Amit Kulkarni Mon, 09 Jun 2008 14:58:08 +0000 http://jeffhobbs.wordpress.com/2008/06/05/intergraph-2008-day-1/#comment-2029 Jeff, It would be better if Transaction Manager was NOT based on Oracle. You want to be database neutral and provide choice for your clients. Jeff,

It would be better if Transaction Manager was NOT based on Oracle. You want to be database neutral and provide choice for your clients.

]]> By: Intergraph 2008, Las Vegas, Nevada http://jeffhobbs.net/2008/06/05/intergraph-2008-day-1/#comment-2027 Intergraph 2008, Las Vegas, Nevada Fri, 06 Jun 2008 07:50:16 +0000 http://jeffhobbs.wordpress.com/2008/06/05/intergraph-2008-day-1/#comment-2027 [...] mentioned in this post, Intergraph is trying to merge the functionality of their public safety CAD (computer aided [...] [...] mentioned in this post, Intergraph is trying to merge the functionality of their public safety CAD (computer aided [...]

]]>